The editorial notes that since 1947, the amount of money spent on highways, roads and streets has exceeded the amount raised through gasoline taxes and other so-called user fees by $600 billion. Today, highway user fees pay only about half the cost of building and maintaining the nation's network of highways, roads and streets. ... At some point very soon, someone in a leadership position is going to have to deliver the bad news about the Easter Bunny, the Tooth Fairy and the fact that there is no such thing as a freeway. Then perhaps we can analyze what the system really costs and how we intend to pay for it.The full editorial is worth a read. See http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/editorials/hc-ed-transportation-costs-0628-20110628-5,0,3838620.story#tugs_story_display.
An excellent editorial in the June 28, 2011 Hartford Courant strikes at the heart of the myth that highways are self-supporting and not subsidized and therefor other forms of transportation are should pay their own way too. The editorial notes that since 1947, the amount of money spent on highways, roads and streets has exceeded the amount raised through gasoline taxes and other so-called user fees by $600 billion. Today, highway user fees pay only about half the cost of building and maintaining the nation's network of highways, roads and streets. ... At some point very soon, someone in a leadership position is going to have to deliver the bad news about the Easter Bunny, the Tooth Fairy and the fact that there is no such thing as a freeway. Then perhaps we can analyze what the system really costs and how we intend to pay for it.The full editorial is worth a read. See http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/editorials/hc-ed-transportation-costs-0628-20110628-5,0,3838620.story#tugs_story_display. Add Comment Christine Stuart reports in CT News Junkie that "The state auditors released their finding on the acquisition of the land owned by Aetna for the New Britain-Hartford Busway. The bottom line: the purchase of the land was done properly. The report stated that there was "no misuse of taxpayer dollars," and disputes the claims that the Department of Transportation overpaid for the land. Not the news the Republicans were hoping to receive when they requested a review of the land purchase for the busway. The Auditors' Report states that: "...[T]he amount DOT paid was in accordance with the Federal regulations governing property acquisitions that are made using Federal funds. The amounts paid were supported by appraisals prepared by independent appraisers that DOT hired. The appraisers were hired to determine the fair market value based on the amount of damages that Aetna would suffer from the taking of the properties. That should not be confused with estimating the fair market value when there is a willing seller and a willing buyer, which in this case would most likely have been considerably less. DOT reviewed the appraisals and made its initial offers to Aetna, totaling $5,630,000, as required by the Federal regulations. Aetna refused the initialoffers, but subsequently ended up accepting them." Read the Auditors' full report here. With a bill pending approval by the House and Senate to install tolls to pay for the completion of Route 11 in Southeastern Connecticut and the recent announcement by Governor Malloy, US Representative Joe Courtney and ConnDOTon funding a $5 million feasibility study for Route 11, the CTLCV Education Fund has asked both sides of the issue to weigh in. This project has been studied for decades and the environmental and economic impacts are huge. To read both sides of the debate click here: Route 11 Debate. For questions, contact Kirsten Griebel at kirsten.griebel@ctlcv.org or 860.236.5442. The League of American Bicyclists, a non-profit group that promotes the rights of cyclists, gave Connecticut a "D" on the state's friendliness to cyclists. Connecticut ranked 40th among other states in bike-friendliness - not so great, but at least we improved from 44th place in 2009. The top five states for bike friendliness include:
Connecticut's recent legislative history may shed some light on our bottom-tier standings. With the last week or so, despite having it on its meeting agenda, the legislature's Finance Committee failed to act on the "vulnerable user" bill, which would have increased penalties for reckless drivers who injure cyclists, pedestrians and other non-car users of the public roads. In all likelihood, the bill is dead this year. In contrast is Maryland, where Governor Martin O'Malley signed the Manslaughter by Vehicle-Criminal Negligence bill, which adds protections for cyclists and pedestrians. It adds a potential misdemeanor manslaughter charge for motorists who cause fatalities by driving in a criminally negligent manner while sober. For more information on the state rankings and evaluation categories, see: At the LOB
It’s all over the Connecticut news, but in case you missed it, the federal government reallocated Florida’s spurned $2.4 Billion (yes, with a B) in high-speed rail funding yesterday. The good news is that Connecticut got a $30 million piece of it, especially since Congress’ recent budget agreements suggested that the Florida money might not be reallocated at all. But the less good news is that our award was significantly less than what we had strenuously advocated for ($100 million). According to the Connecticut Mirror, DOT Secretary Ray LaHood announced his agency had received almost 100 applications for various rail projects around the country, totaling $10 billion. From those, DOT chose 15 states and Amtrak to receive $2.02 billion for 22 high-speed intercity passenger projects. The investment in the Northeast corridor to speed up trains is "unprecedented," DOT said in a news release, and includes a $450 million award to Amtrak to expand capacity and reliability in the region. In all, the Northeast corridor is slated to get $795 million for a range of projects. And as the New York Times editorial puts it, Florida voters will get some time to think about their governor’s decision to spurn the rail money “as they sit in traffic jams, burning up $4-a-gallon gasoline. In fact, some of them clearly have thought about it because Mr. Scott now has some of the worst approval ratings of a Florida official in the last decade.” Take your pick of a few of the articles covering the rest of the story: CTLCV joined with Transit for Connecticut, Tri-State Transportation Campaign, Regional Plan Association, and CRCOG in this Letter to Editor of the Connecticut Post:At first glance, the cost of the New Britain-Hartford Busway may seem high ("Bus-only highway should be scrapped," editorial, April 29). However, the cost of the project that has been touted includes not only the cost to construct the busway but also to purchase right-of-ways, construction of a bike path adjacent to the busway, and the construction of bridges as well as 11 bus stations, all other structures required for the busway and the purchase of new vehicles. Additionally, the cost estimate includes a buffer to account for inflation of costs. The Connecticut Department of Transportation has said on numerous occasions that due to the current economy, it is very likely that bids for the project may come in at or below the estimate. Read more: http://www.ctpost.com/default/article/Busway-necessary-for-state-s-transit-future-1369276.php#ixzz1LxlZ8wHB CTLCV joined with a broad coalition of 27 signatories from entities representing everything from CCSU to developers, chambers of commerce, the League of Women Voters, labor and environmental groups, who took note of the Bond Commission’s recent decision to release funding to get the Hartford-New Britain bus rapid transit project. The coalition’s thank you letter to Governor Malloy appears below. ---------- May 2, 2011 The Honorable Dannel P. Malloy Governor, State of Connecticut State Capitol Hartford, CT 06106 Dear Governor Malloy, Please accept our thanks and appreciation for your steadfast support and leadership of the New Britain/Hartford Busway project. We believe that the New Britain/Hartford Busway project represents the future for both Connecticut’s economy and transportation infrastructure. The benefits of investing in the Busway are multifold for the state. The construction of the Busway will generate thousands of construction and associated jobs; millions of dollars to be invested in transit-oriented development projects surrounding the Busway will create new jobs and business opportunities; the Busway will offer congestion-free travel to transit riders and help decrease traffic on the most congested part of I-84; and harmful carbon emissions will be decreased. We commend you for your leadership and support and thank the Bond Commission for releasing the funds needed for the Busway to proceed. If you have any questions please contact Karen Burnaska, Transit for Connecticut or Lyle Wray, Capitol Region Council of Governments. We look forward to working with you as the Busway becomes a reality. Sincerely, Tim O’Brien, State Representative, New Britain and Newington Pedro E. Segarra, Mayor, City of Hartford Timothy T. Stewart, Mayor, City of New Britain Scott McBride, Deputy Mayor, Town of Newington Lyle Wray, Executive Director, Capitol Region Council of Governments Gerry Amodio, Executive Director, New Britain Downtown District Lori Brown, Executive Director, CT League of Conservation Voters Karen Burnaska, Coordinator, Transit for Connecticut Tom Colligan, Interim Executive Director, CT Coalition for Environmental Justice Cheryl Dunson, President, League of Women Voters of CT Oz Griebel, President, MetroHartford Alliance David Kooris, Vice President, Regional Plan Association Avner Krohn, President, Jasko Development Charles LeChonce, Business Manager, CT Laborers District Council Ryan Lynch, Connecticut Coordinator, Tri-State Transportation Campaign Jeffrey Merrow, Business Manager, Laborers Local 611 Jack Miller, President, Central Connecticut State University William F. Millerick, President, New Britain Chamber of Commerce Don Strait, Executive Director, CT Fund for the Environment Mary Tomolonius, Executive Director, CT Assoc for Community Transportation City of Hartford Neighborhood Revitalization Zones: Bernadine Silvers and Jackie McKinney, Co-Chairs, Board of Directors, Hartford 2000, Inc. David Corrigan, Chair, Frog Hollow NRZ Donna Thompson Daniels, President, Blue Hills NRZ Lynn Ferrari, President, Hartford’s CSS/CON NRZ Brandon McGee, Vice President, Northeast NRZ David Morin, Secretary, Parkville Revitalization Association Tomas Nenortas, Chair, South Downtown NRZ After months of research and evaluation, the National Complete Streets Coalition has named Connecticut’s Complete Streets law, enacted in 2010, as one of the best in the country. Championed by former Representative Tom Kehoe, the complete streets law is an important component of smart growth policy, making roads safe and usable for transportation alternatives to the car. Safe, usable streets make for more livable cities and towns. The complete streets report, which includes the coalition’s ten elements of an ideal complete streets policy, is available at http://www.completestreets.org/webdocs/resources/cs-policyanalysis.pdf. Tom Swarr, Chair of the CTLCV Education Fund, passes along this very cool link to StreetFilms.org, a site that documents livable streets worldwide in short films that show how smart transportation design and policy can result in better places to live, work and play. Their nearly 350 videos have been viewed over 3.5 million times and have inspired action and behavioral change worldwide. Street Films produced Moving Beyond the Automobile, “a ten part video series that explores solutions to the problem of automobile dependency. It's a visual handbook that will help guide policy makers, advocacy organizations, teachers, students, and others into a world that values pedestrian plazas over parking lots and train tracks over highways. Cars were then, and this is now. Welcome to the future.” Still wondering about the bus rapid transit project coming to Hartford & New Britain? Check out this 3-minute video: |
RSS Feed