CTLCV Education Fund
  • Home
  • About
    • Board of Directors
    • Staff
    • Contact
  • Community Organizing
    • Transportation Climate Initiative
    • Clean School Buses
    • Grassroots Committees
    • Voting Rights
  • Resources
    • Briefing Papers
    • Clean Energy for All
    • Transportation Guide
  • Get Involved
    • 2022 Environmental Summit
    • Internships >
      • Intern Alumni
    • Job Openings
    • Volunteer With Us
  • DONATE
    • DONATE TODAY
    • MONTHLY GIVING
    • STOCK AND IRA GIVING
    • Foundation Support
    • Julie Belaga Scholarship Fund
  • Home
  • About
    • Board of Directors
    • Staff
    • Contact
  • Community Organizing
    • Transportation Climate Initiative
    • Clean School Buses
    • Grassroots Committees
    • Voting Rights
  • Resources
    • Briefing Papers
    • Clean Energy for All
    • Transportation Guide
  • Get Involved
    • 2022 Environmental Summit
    • Internships >
      • Intern Alumni
    • Job Openings
    • Volunteer With Us
  • DONATE
    • DONATE TODAY
    • MONTHLY GIVING
    • STOCK AND IRA GIVING
    • Foundation Support
    • Julie Belaga Scholarship Fund
Pre and Post Survey Results
Picture
PRE & POST SURVEY RESULTS
Question
Pre-survey
​Post-survey
Outcomes
Knowledge of environmental issues
Great: 1
Good: 4
Moderate: 3
Low: 2
5 students reported their knowledge on the environment was good to great
5 students reported their knowledge on the environment was low to moderate
Great: 3
Good: 6
Moderate: 2
Low: 0
9 students reported their knowledge on the environment was good to great
2 students reported their knowledge on the environment was low to moderate
Approximately 82% of students reported during the post-test that their knowledge on the environment was good to great, compared to only 50% of students during the pre-test – an increase of 32% (rounded to the nearest percentage).
Understanding of government at the local level
Great: 3
Good: 3
Moderate: 1
Low: 3
6 students reported their understanding of local government was good to great

4 students reported their understanding of local government was low to moderate
Great: 4
Good: 5
Moderate: 2
Low: 0
9 students reported their understanding of local government was good to great

2 students reported their understanding of government was low to moderate
Post-test results indicated that approximately 82% of students reported their understanding of government at the local level is good to great, compared to 60% of students during the pre-test – an increase of 22% (rounded to the nearest percentage).
Visited City Hall
Yes: 4 (40%)
No: 6 (60%)
Yes: 11 (100%)
No: 0 ​
By the end of the CHISPA program, 100% of students reported having visited City Hall, compared to only 40% of students at the start of the program – an increase of 60% (rounded to the nearest percentage).
Visited State Capital
Yes: 7 (70%)
No: 3 (30%)
Yes: 11 (1000%)
No: 0
By the end of the CHISPA program, 100% of students reported having visited the State Capital, compared to only 70% of students at the start of the program – an increase of 30% (rounded to the nearest percentage).
Met with elected officials
Yes: 2 (20%)
No: 8 (80%)
Yes: 11 (100%)
No: 0
By the end of the CHISPA program, 100% of students reported having met with an elected official, compared to only 20% of students at the start of the program – an increase of 80% (rounded to the nearest percentage).
Reached out and written to elected officials about an issue of concern
Yes: 0
No: 10 (100%)
Yes: 8 (73%)
No: 3 (27%)
​By the end of the CHISPA program, 73% of students reported reaching out to elected officials about an issue of concern, compared to 0% of students at the start of the program – an increase of 73% (rounded to the nearest percentage).
What is environmental justice?
50% of students were able to respond accurately
91% of students were able to respond accurately
By the end of the CHISPA program, 91% of students were able to accurately describe what environmental justice was, compared to only 50% of students at the start of the program – an increase of 41% (rounded to the nearest percentage).
Why is community organizing important?
66% of students were able to respond accurately
82% of students were able to respond accurately
​By the end of the CHISPA program, 82% of students were able to accurately explain the importance of community organizing, compared to only 66% of students at the start of the program – an increase of 16% (rounded to the nearest percentage).
Why is connecting with elected officials important?
45% of students were able to respond accurately
91% of students were able to respond accurately
​By the end of the CHISPA program, 91% of students were able to accurately describe the importance of connecting with elected officials, compared to only 45% of students at the start of the program – an increase of 46% (rounded to the nearest percentage).
To view the Pre and Post Survey Results​ as a PDF, please click here.
Donate Today
Action Alerts
Intern With Us
The Connecticut League of Environmental Voters Education Fund is dedicated to strengthening Connecticut's environmental movement through education, developing resources on key issues, and organizing networks of environmental groups to protect our natural resources. | Privacy Policy
© 2008-2020 CTLCV Ed Fund | 553 Farmington Avenue, Suite 201 | Hartford, CT 06105 | 860.236.5442 | ctlcv@ctlcv.org